An American Library Association sponsored webcast, "What's next for RDA and the 3R Project" was presented Friday, September 14, 2018. The presentation provided updates on development of the new version of the RDA Toolkit available at beta.rdatoolkit.org.
The presenters emphasized that changes to the beta toolkit scheduled for implementation September 26, 2018 were at least partially driven by user feedback. These enhancements include improvements to the HTML editor, improvements to search, updates to tools, and improvements to MARC mapping. The RDA Steering Committee plans to have the beta toolkit function in compliance with W3C accessibility guidelines by the end of the year.
In response to a "use case" for a way to cite to particular guidelines in RDA, citation numbers will be introduced. These will be six to eight digit numbers randomly associated with instructions. They will be "invisible" but searchable within the toolkit.
The presenters again emphasized consistence in structure across instructions; every element will be laid out in the same order. This "boilerplate" is a feature of the content management system used to edit the beta toolkit. Reusable components will enable more efficient updates and translations.
Since RDA is an implementation and extension of the IFLA LRM, the RSC is now able to resolve gaps and inconsistencies within the toolkit. The editors continue to add and adjust content on a regular basis including 96 elements to be added as part of a new Appellation element and modeling of aggregates and serials within the framework of the IFLA LRM.
Navigation and utility should be enhanced by the addition of a "relationship matrix" and a graphical browser intended to show elements in context.
Workshop
slides and an archived recording of the session are available. The RDA Toolkit also has a YouTube Channel with links to other presentations.
Monday, September 17, 2018
Friday, September 14, 2018
BIBFRAME Update Forum at the ALA Annual Conference 2018
https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/bibframe-update-an2018.html
A BIBFRAME update forum was held at the 2018 ALA
Annual Conference with presentations from institutions reporting on projects
underway.
Jodi Williamschen, Library of Congress, gave an update
on BIBFRAME Pilot 2.0. She reported that
recent infrastructure improvements at LC have been made with the addition of
servers and software updates. The
BIBFRAME database, updated daily, contains over 17 million MARC records that
have been converted to BIBFRAME Works.
A BIBFRAME 2.0 Implementation Register
https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/implementation/register.html is available on the
LC website. Located here is information
about a project undertaken at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Library (UIUC) that focused on creating an interface and converting 7,829
Dublin Core items to BIBFRAME 2.0. A
link is provided to the UIUC Bibframe search interface http://sif.library.illinois.edu/bibframe/search2.php.
A presentation by Tiziana Possemato, Casalini Libri -
@Cult, From MARC to BIBFRAME in the
SHARE-VDE project, highlighted a collaborative linked data endeavor
developed by Casalini Libri (European bibliographic and authority data
provider) and @Cult (ILS and Discovery tool provider). Initial input for the project was received
from sixteen North American Research Libraries.
Jeremy Nelson, Metadata & Systems Librarian at
Colorado College and co-founder of Knowledgelinks.io presented a model for using
BIBFRAME in a multi-institutional projects.
The project known as Plains to Peaks collective attempts to unite
isolated digital collections located across Colorado and Wyoming into one
platform.
Nathan Putnam, Director, Metadata Quality, OCLC discussed
the OCLC Research process in
converting approximately 11 million MARC records to BIBFRAME 2.0. Through the process the team learned the
importance of Work IDs and URI. OCLC remains
committed to working with LC to support development of BIBFRAME
For links to individual presentations and further
information see the BIBFRAME webpage at the Library of Congress website https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/bibframe-update-an2018.html
Monday, August 27, 2018
Getting to Know TS Librarians: Ryan Tamares
1. Introduce yourself (name & position).
Hello, I’m Ryan Tamares, Head of Collection Services, Robert Crown Law Library, Stanford Law School. I began my work at the library as Lead Cataloging Specialist in 2004, and was promoted to the role of Catalog Librarian in 2013. I have held the title of Head of Collection Services since 2016. My experiences in technical services roles have been so helpful, providing much background from where the collection has been as well as informing on how the library might proceed in the future.
2. Does your job title actually describe what you do? Why/why not?
This is not inaccurate, but doesn’t tell very much about what I do. Officially I oversee the cataloging, processing, and preservation of my library’s collection. I collaborate with my colleagues in other departments as well as the main campus library to make sure library users are able to find and access resources, regardless if they are physical or otherwise.
3. What are you reading right now?
I began reading Pamela Druckerman’s There are no grownups (Penguin Press, 2018) on my flight to AALL Annual in Baltimore, and am nearly done with the book. On professional readings, I am taking a look at two new titles: Elevating customer service in higher education : a practical guide / Heath Boice-Pardee, Emily Richardson, Eileen Soisson (Academic Impressions, 2018), and Reengineering the library : issues in electronic resources management / edited by George Stachokas (ALA Editions, 2018).
4. If you could work in any library (either a type of library or a specific one), what would it be? Why?
Given the choice, I would love to work in a music library, as that is in part my training—my undergraduate degree is in music education, and I earned a Master of Music in bassoon performance. Having a background in performing and teaching music has truly informed me about working with others as well as training people. These are skills that have helped me greatly as a librarian.
Monday, July 16, 2018
Revised RDA Toolkit workshop
Recently I was able to attend a workshop at the American Library Association Annual Meeting, sponsored by the RDA Steering Committee, providing an introduction to the beta revised RDA Toolkit. The RDA Steering Committee (RSC) initiated the RDA Toolkit Restructure and Redesign (3R) project in 2017, redesigning the toolkit to align with the IFLA Library Reference Model.
The beta Toolkit is available at https://beta.rdatoolkit.org/rda.web/ and users are encouraged to explore and provide feedback. Presentations from the workshop are available on the RSC's presentation site, http://www.rda-rsc.org/node/560.
What do I think the takeaways are? An understanding of the IFLA LRM is essential to navigating the revised toolkit as all instructions are organized in accordance with this model. The toolkit is very much a work in progress, so it is difficult to tell how it will be to work with, examples are incomplete and some navigational aids have yet to be developed. While the language used is very consistent, it is also somewhat opaque. The new version will be reliant on "application profiles" to provide guidance to catalogers for use of the recording options presented for each data element. It is anticipated that communities of practice, e.g. music catalogers, law catalogers, will develop best practices for catalogers working in these areas.
The RSC has not determined a date for transition to the revised toolkit; they must first agree that the 3R project is complete. The RDA Board must unanimously approve the determination. A transition date will then be announced; the original site will remain available for one year beyond that date so users can move to the new toolkit.
The beta Toolkit is available at https://beta.rdatoolkit.org/rda.web/ and users are encouraged to explore and provide feedback. Presentations from the workshop are available on the RSC's presentation site, http://www.rda-rsc.org/node/560.
What do I think the takeaways are? An understanding of the IFLA LRM is essential to navigating the revised toolkit as all instructions are organized in accordance with this model. The toolkit is very much a work in progress, so it is difficult to tell how it will be to work with, examples are incomplete and some navigational aids have yet to be developed. While the language used is very consistent, it is also somewhat opaque. The new version will be reliant on "application profiles" to provide guidance to catalogers for use of the recording options presented for each data element. It is anticipated that communities of practice, e.g. music catalogers, law catalogers, will develop best practices for catalogers working in these areas.
The RSC has not determined a date for transition to the revised toolkit; they must first agree that the 3R project is complete. The RDA Board must unanimously approve the determination. A transition date will then be announced; the original site will remain available for one year beyond that date so users can move to the new toolkit.
Monday, July 2, 2018
Stanford Libraries Awarded Grant to Implement LD Environment
The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation has awarded Stanford Libraries a $4
million grant to lead an effort to integrate library data into the greater Web
via linked data. Stanford will be partnering with Cornell, Harvard, and the
University of Iowa to implement a prototype environment and tools over the next
two years. A deliberate partnership with the Program for Cooperative Cataloging
(PCC) and the Library of Congress has been included in the project, allowing
for an expansion of the number of libraries that will be able to implement
linked data.
More details can be found in the press release on Library
Technology Guides at https://librarytechnology.org/pr/23584.
Monday, June 25, 2018
Getting to Know TS Librarians: Jason LeMay
1. Introduce yourself:
I am Jason LeMay, Assistant Law Librarian for Cataloging and Metadata at Emory University’s Hugh F. MacMillan Law Library in Atlanta, Georgia.
2. Does your job title actually describe what you do? Why/why not?
Most of the time, yes. My primary role is cataloger, and during normal times I spend a substantial amount of my time at work cataloging more complex materials that need original cataloging. I also spend a fair amount of time cataloging rare materials, with a large backlog of early modern European dissertations to guarantee that I’ll be busy for quite a long time.
Most recently, I’ve been spending the bulk of my time performing my now-retired supervisor’s duties – paying invoices, dealing with vendors, and general administrative technical services tasks. Now that this position has been filled, I anticipate being able to return to my growing backlog of cataloging.
3. What are you reading right now?
I actually just finished my latest book yesterday, The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank. I’m finally getting around to my list of “books everyone should read,” and Anne Frank’s diary was up near the top. I’ll probably keep with the theme and start on Wiesel’s Night next.
4. You suddenly have a free day at work, what project would you work on?
I would probably tackle some rare books that have been getting neglected. I have a few bound-withs that are waiting that would probably top my list. I generally dislike cataloging bound-withs, so they tend to get left until I truly have time to work on them.
Thursday, June 7, 2018
LawArXiv One Year Anniversary Report
It hardly seems like it's been over a year since we posted about the launch of LawArXiv. LawArXiv now houses nearly 700 open access legal articles. The organization has published a One Year Anniversary Report.
Some of the highlights from the report:
Goals for the coming year included:
Some of the highlights from the report:
- 89% of the submissions to the repository are from Cornell, one of the developers of the platform
- The majority of the submissions deal with intellectual property law
- A process for batch uploading of articles was developed in April 2018
Goals for the coming year included:
- Adding the ability for institutions to use their branding on their submissions
- Setting up subject-based email alerts
- Adding a data field for the institution of the article author
Labels:
information technology,
preservation,
repository
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
